$23.99
1) (5 points) Give the asymptotic bounds for T(n) in each of the following recurrences. Make your bounds as tight as possible and justify your answers. Assume the base case T(0) = 1 and/ or T(1) = 1.
a) T(n) = 2T(n - 2) + 1
b) T(n) = T(n - 1) + n^3
c) T(n) = 2T(n/6) + 2n^2
2) (5 points) The quaternary search algorithm is a modification of the binary search algorithm that splits the input not into two sets of almost-equal sizes, but into four sets of sizes approximately one-fourth.
a) Verbally describe and write pseudo-code for the quaternary search algorithm.
b) Give the recurrence for the quaternary search algorithm
c) Solve the recurrence to determine the asymptotic running time of the algorithm. How
does the running time of the quaternary search algorithm compare to that of the binary
search algorithm.
3) (5 points) Design and analyze a divide and conquer algorithm that determines the minimum and maximum value of an unsorted array.
a) Verbally describe and write pseudo-code for the min_and_max algorithm.
b) Give the recurrence.
c) Solve the recurrence to determine the asymptotic running time of the algorithm. How
does the theoretical running time of the recursive min_and_max algorithm compare to
that of an iterative algorithm for finding the minimum and maximum values of an array.
4) (5 points) Consider the following pseudocode for a sorting algorithm.
StoogeSort(A[0…n-1])
if n =2 and A[0] A[1]
swap A[0] and A[1]
else if n 2
m = ceiling(2n/3)
StoogeSort(A[0…m-1])
StoogeSort(A[n-m…n-1])
StoogeSort(A[0…m-1])
a) Verbally describe how the STOOGESORT algorithm sorts its input.
b) Would STOOGESORT still sort correctly if we replaced m = ceiling(2n/3) with
m = floor(2n/3)? If yes prove if no give a counterexample. (Hint: what happens when
n = 4?)
c) State a recurrence for the number of comparisons executed by STOOGESORT.
d) Solve the recurrence to determine the asymptotic running time.
5) (10 points)
a) Implement STOOGESORT from problem 4 to sort an array of integers. Implement the
algorithm in the same language you used for the sorting algorithms in HW 1. Your
program should be able to read inputs from a file called “data.txt” where the first value
of each line is the number of integers that need to be sorted, followed by the integers
(like in HW 1). The output will be written to a file called “stooge.out”.
b) Now that you have proven that your code runs correctly using the data.txt input file,
you can modify the code to collect running time data. Instead of reading arrays from a
file to sort, you will now generate arrays of size n containing random integer values and
then time how long it takes to sort the arrays. We will not be executing the code that
generates the running time data so it does not have to be submitted to TEACH or even
execute on flip. Include a “text” copy of the modified code in the written HW submitted
in Canvas. You will need at least seven values of t (time) greater than 0. If there is
variability in the times between runs of the algorithm you may want to take the average
time of several runs for each value of n.
c) Plot the running time data you collected on an individual graph with n on the x-axis
and time on the y-axis. You may use Excel, Matlab, R or any other software. Also plot
the data from Stooge algorithm together on a combined graph with your results for
merge and insertion sort from HW1.
d) What type of curve best fits the StoogeSort data set? Give the equation of the curve
that best “fits” the data and draw that curve on the graphs of created in part c). How
does your experimental running time compare to the theoretical running time of the
algorithm?